Power plant, hydroelectric, construction · Texas

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM)

Houston, TX · ~1,050 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) runs at 13% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Power plant, hydroelectric, construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM): 0.4 TCR = 13% of Power plant, hydroelectric, construction BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) safety composite

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) held a steady TCR band

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM)'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.3 in 2020 to 0.4 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.3 · 2022=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 13% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #37/114
  • PHOTO M.R. Pittman Group, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~1,050 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M.R. Pittman Group, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) averages 0.4 TCR (13% of the Power plant, hydroelectric, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) TCR series: 2020=0.3 · 2022=0.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) falls in its industry

932 Power plant, hydroelectric, co establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 114 Power plant, hydroelectric, co employers in Texas.

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) (1,050 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Primoris Energy Services (PIFM)
Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) (1,050 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Primoris Energy Services (PIFM) has more employees than the Power plant, hydroelectric, construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.4 0.2 4 0 0
2020 0.3 0.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · TX · Houston

932 Power plant, hydroelectric, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M.R. Pittman Group, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR TIM at Marathon Petroleum Company Catlettsburg KY 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 104280 - Foothill Phase 2B 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 104732 - HDOT - Kapalama Wharf & Dredging 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fujitsu Network Communications 1,049 FTE
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HOU8 1,051 FTE
STATE-SIZE LK Jordan, Houston, LTD dba L.K. Jordan & Associates 1,051 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Home Healthcare, LLC 1,051 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Milliken - Pine Mountain Plant 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Spartan Energy Services LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR UCare Minnesota - 600 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR GES-San Jose 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Premium Packing, Inc. 1,050 FTE
NAT-SIZE JW Marriott Marco Island Beach Resort 1,050 FTE
NAT-SIZE Weston Solutions Inc. 1,050 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tucson HomeGoods Distribution Center 1,050 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.