Refrigerated Warehousing And Storage · Virginia

Prince George Replenish Ctr

Prince George, VA · ~466 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.2
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
2
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prince George Replenish Ctr runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Refrigerated Warehousing And Storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Prince George Replenish Ctr: 2.2 TCR = 38% of Refrigerated Warehousing And Storage BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prince George Replenish Ctr safety composite

Prince George Replenish Ctr scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 2

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2024

Prince George Replenish Ctr injury rate improved

Prince George Replenish Ctr's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.4 in 2017 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.4 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=2.0 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493120 · Prince George, VA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.2 · 38% of ind

  • DART 1.4 DART
  • RANK #3/27
  • PHOTO Griswold
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 84 inj
  • SIZE ~466 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Griswold (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Prince George Replenish Ctr in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prince George Replenish Ctr averages 2.2 TCR (38% of the Refrigerated Warehousing And Storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prince George Replenish Ctr TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=2 · 2024=2 · BLS 5.8

Where Prince George Replenish Ctr falls in its industry

1,039 Refrigerated Warehousing And S establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 27 Refrigerated Warehousing And S employers in Virginia.

Prince George Replenish Ctr (466 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Prince George Replenish Ctr
Prince George Replenish Ctr (466 employees, TCR 2.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 68 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Prince George Replenish Ctr has more employees than the Refrigerated Warehousing And Storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 1.4 10 0 0
2023 2.0 1.4 10 0 0
2022 2.1 1.5 10 0 1
2021 1.2 0.8 6 0 1
2020 3.0 1.1 13 0 0
2019 1.8 0.9 8 0 0
2018 3.1 2.1 15 0 0
2017 2.4 1.4 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493120 · VA · Prince George

1,039 Refrigerated Warehousing And Storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 33 employers in Prince George, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Griswold 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jefferson 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cloverleaf Cold Storage-Benson 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trilogy Warehouse Partners I, LLC 2.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE VA-90-FALLS CHURCH, VA 466 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rappahannock Electric Cooperative - Entire 467 FTE
STATE-SIZE Prospect Waterproofing Company 465 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wegmans Potomac Mills 055 467 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCM Industries, LLC 358 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - KRB2 338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rolls-Royce Crosspointe 304 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prince George, VA 265 FTE
NAT-TCR Mossville 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Bondy Haney Service 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Murray Store 2.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Milford Health Department 2.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ridgeway Plumbing, Inc. 466 FTE
NAT-SIZE potter concrete ltd 466 FTE
NAT-SIZE NP Mechanical Inc. 466 FTE
NAT-SIZE IFF South Brunswick 466 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.