Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing · New Jersey

Princeton Instruments - Trenton

Trenton, NJ · ~67 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Princeton Instruments - Trenton runs at 18% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Princeton Instruments - Trenton: 0.6 TCR = 18% of Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Princeton Instruments - Trenton safety composite

Princeton Instruments - Trenton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

70/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.8

2022→2024

Princeton Instruments - Trenton injury rate improved

Princeton Instruments - Trenton's TCR fell 1.8 from 1.8 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=1.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334516 · Trenton, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 18% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/6
  • PHOTO Little Falls Site DE
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Little Falls Site DE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Princeton Instruments - Trenton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Princeton Instruments - Trenton averages 0.6 TCR (18% of the Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Princeton Instruments - Trenton TCR series: 2022=1.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Princeton Instruments - Trenton falls in its industry

213 Laboratory analytical instrume establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 6 Laboratory analytical instrume employers in New Jersey.

Princeton Instruments - Trenton (67 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Princeton Instruments - Trenton
Princeton Instruments - Trenton (67 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 133 employees and a TCR of 1.2

Princeton Instruments - Trenton has fewer employees than the Laboratory analytical instruments (excep median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.8 1.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334516 · NJ · Trenton

213 Laboratory analytical instruments (except optical) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 99 employers in Trenton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Little Falls Site DE 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MKS Ophir - Spiricon 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR TA Instruments New Castle, DE 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rigaku Analytical Devices 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gloucester 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlantic Capes Fisheries 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duke Farms Foundation 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSEG Power ER&T 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR CapitalHealth Regional Medical Center 2,060 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capital Health Regional Medical Center 2,022 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trenton Board of Education 1,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential HVAC and Supply : MFG-Trenton, NJ-USA 1,135 FTE
NAT-TCR Madison Lane Recycling Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Columbus College of Art & Design 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Daybreak Industrial Inc 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Nestle Freedom 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kreider Mechanical Inc. (Kreider, Ayers, & Associates) 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guess Cattle Co LLC 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE West 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE 143009-San Jose | CA | SAN-555 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.