Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) · New Jersey

Princeton

Hamilton, NJ · ~36 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Princeton runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) workplace, earning a grade C.

Princeton: 4.4 TCR = 98% of Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Princeton safety composite

Princeton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2016→2024

Princeton injury rate improved

Princeton's TCR fell 6.6 from 12.8 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 12.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=12.8 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=6.0 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=6.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Hamilton, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 98% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #28/55
  • PHOTO 5057 - Lewisville
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 5057 - Lewisville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Princeton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Princeton averages 4.4 TCR (98% of the Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Princeton TCR series: 2016=12.8 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=6 · 2022=8.6 · 2023=3 · 2024=6.3 · BLS 4.5

Where Princeton falls in its industry

2,875 Tree services (e.g., bracing, establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 55 Tree services (e.g., bracing, employers in New Jersey.

Princeton (36 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Princeton
Princeton (36 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Princeton has fewer employees than the Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.3 3.1 2 0 0
2023 3.0 3.0 1 0 0
2022 8.6 5.7 3 0 0
2021 6.0 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.2 3.2 1 0 0
2016 12.8 6.4 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · NJ · Hamilton

2,875 Tree services (e.g., bracing, planting, pruning, removal, spraying, surgery, trimming) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 85 employers in Hamilton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 5057 - Lewisville 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5325 - Portland 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5991 - Appleton 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fitzgerald's 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lakewood Township Municipal Utilities Authority 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Atlantic City Sewerage Company 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE B. Tait Builders, L.L.C. 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phoenix Diversified Group, Inc. 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR RWJ University Hospital at Hamilton 1,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allies, Inc. 883 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJTRN - TRENTON 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR TRENTON (NJTRN) 485 FTE
NAT-TCR Genesis Industries, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American Soda (Solvay Chemicals) Parachute Sodium Bicarbonate Facility 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Ozark Fire Sprinkler Co Inc 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Murray Equipment, Inc 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Alpharetta #857 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Acura of Auburn 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prinsco, Inc. - Fargo 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Austin Prestressed 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.