Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Princeton Village Assisted Living

Clackamas, OR · ~34 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Princeton Village Assisted Living runs at 382% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Princeton Village Assisted Living: 14.5 TCR = 382% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Princeton Village Assisted Living safety composite

Princeton Village Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Princeton Village Assisted Living: 21.0 → 77.5 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 77.5 TCR · DART/TCR 4.54× in 2022

Princeton Village Assisted Living's TCR rose 56.5 from 21.0 in 2016 to 77.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 4.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Clackamas, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.5 · 382% of ind

  • DART 65.8 DART
  • RANK #161/218
  • PHOTO Blossom Grove Alzhei…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blossom Grove Alzheimer's Special Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Princeton Village Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Princeton Village Assisted Living averages 14.5 TCR (382% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Princeton Village Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=21 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=3.1 · 2019=9.8 · 2020=40.2 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=77.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Princeton Village Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #161 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Princeton Village Assisted Living (34 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Princeton Village Assisted Living
Princeton Village Assisted Living (34 employees, TCR 14.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Princeton Village Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 77.5 65.8 4 16 0
2021 9.4 9.4 1 2 0
2020 40.2 31.0 3 10 0
2019 9.8 3.3 3 0 0
2018 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.5 3.5 1 0 0
2016 21.0 21.0 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Clackamas

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 144 employers in Clackamas, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blossom Grove Alzheimer's Special Care Center 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSL-Glenwood Village of Overland Park 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadence Lakewood 14.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Augustana Emerald Crest Shakopee #425 14.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gabriel Farms Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper Family Orchards LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sage Hollow Ranch 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Elkton 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10810010 SUNNYSIDE MEDICAL CENTER SIM LAB 2,327 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-10810010 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2032-10110010 2,176 FTE
CITY-NEAR 422-DC001 942 FTE
NAT-TCR Blossom Grove Alzheimer's Special Care Center 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Vidant North Hospital 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 479522-MEM-NORTH 14.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-SWY-0027-0027-01799 14.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG213 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allied Waste Niagara Falls Landfill LLC 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG538 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG688 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.