Cutting dies (e.g., paper, leather, textile) manufacturing · Wisconsin

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc.

Neenah, WI · ~24 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. runs at 241% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cutting dies (e.g., paper, leather, textile) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc.: 8.0 TCR = 241% of Cutting dies (e.g., paper, leather, textile) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. safety composite

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.9

2018→2024

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. injury rate improved

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.9 from 3.9 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 13.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.9 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=10.6 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332216 · Neenah, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.0 · 241% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/14
  • PHOTO 1120 Mason Circle
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1120 Mason Circle (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. averages 8.0 TCR (241% of the Cutting dies (e.g., paper, leather, textile) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. TCR series: 2018=3.9 · 2019=8.2 · 2020=13.4 · 2021=9.4 · 2022=10.6 · 2023=10.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. falls in its industry

174 Cutting dies (e.g., paper, lea establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 14 Cutting dies (e.g., paper, lea employers in Wisconsin.

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc.
Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. (24 employees, TCR 8.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Printron Steel Rule Die, Inc. has fewer employees than the Cutting dies (e.g., paper, leather, text median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 10.2 5.1 2 0 0
2022 10.6 10.6 2 0 0
2021 9.4 4.7 2 0 0
2020 13.4 4.5 3 0 0
2019 8.2 0.0 2 0 0
2018 3.9 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332216 · WI · Neenah

174 Cutting dies (e.g., paper, leather, textile) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 182 employers in Neenah, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1120 Mason Circle 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR BONDHUS CORPORATION 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Britain Hand Tools 7.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bon Tool Warehouse 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Huntsinger Farms, Inc. 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Weiss Family Farms, Incorporated 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Omro Dairy, LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrim's Hatchery 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Neenah IOEC Corporate Offices 1,745 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miron Construction Co., Inc. 1,490 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center - Neenah 1,445 FTE
CITY-NEAR ThedaCare Regional Medical Center Neenah 1,399 FTE
NAT-TCR Commercial Fire Protection, Inc. 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Riveridge Packing 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #920 8.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Stone Systems of Chicago 8.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mulholland Citrus 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammond Expanders 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Humphrey Agronomy & Grain 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE James Thomas Heating and Cooling 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.