Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing · Wisconsin

Prism Plastics Products Inc.

New Richmond, WI · ~51 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prism Plastics Products Inc. runs at 122% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Prism Plastics Products Inc.: 4.0 TCR = 122% of Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prism Plastics Products Inc. safety composite

Prism Plastics Products Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2019→2024

Prism Plastics Products Inc. injury rate improved

Prism Plastics Products Inc.'s TCR fell 6.8 from 9.7 in 2019 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=9.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · New Richmond, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 122% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #21/32
  • PHOTO Automated Systems of…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~51 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Automated Systems of Tacoma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Prism Plastics Products Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prism Plastics Products Inc. averages 4.0 TCR (122% of the Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prism Plastics Products Inc. TCR series: 2019=9.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Prism Plastics Products Inc. falls in its industry

448 Injection molding machinery fo establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 32 Injection molding machinery fo employers in Wisconsin.

Prism Plastics Products Inc. (51 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Prism Plastics Products Inc.
Prism Plastics Products Inc. (51 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Prism Plastics Products Inc. has fewer employees than the Injection molding machinery for plastics median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 2 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 9.7 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · WI · New Richmond

448 Injection molding machinery for plastics manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 33 employers in New Richmond, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Automated Systems of Tacoma 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Viant 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverview Drive 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR SP Industries - 103 Warminster 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Biddick, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Delafield 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.F. Tomasini Contractors, Inc. 51 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kraemer North America - Iowa - All Others 51 FTE
CITY-NEAR Phillips Medisize Corporation - Phillips Medical New Richmond 450 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Richmond Westfields Hospital 417 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5432 411 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5432 305 FTE
NAT-TCR Cascade General Inc 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lake Hamilton Health and Rehab 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mahoning County Justice Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Hunt Bros Service 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Robert E. Porter Construction Co., Inc. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE GC Electric CO, INC. 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Brien Steel Service- Lacon 51 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northlake Steel Corporation 51 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.