Commercial building construction general contractors · New Jersey

Prismatic Development Corporation

Fairfield, NJ · ~56 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prismatic Development Corporation runs at 60% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Commercial building construction general contractors workplace, earning a grade B.

Prismatic Development Corporation: 1.7 TCR = 60% of Commercial building construction general contractors BLS 2.9 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prismatic Development Corporation safety composite

Prismatic Development Corporation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.8

2016→2024

Prismatic Development Corporation injury rate improved

Prismatic Development Corporation's TCR fell 4.8 from 4.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2017=5.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Fairfield, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 60% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #30/66
  • PHOTO Paul Risk Associates…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~56 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Paul Risk Associates, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Prismatic Development Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prismatic Development Corporation averages 1.7 TCR (60% of the Commercial building construction general contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prismatic Development Corporation TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2017=5.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where Prismatic Development Corporation falls in its industry

4,692 Commercial building constructi establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 66 Commercial building constructi employers in New Jersey.

Prismatic Development Corporation (56 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Prismatic Development Corporation
Prismatic Development Corporation (56 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Prismatic Development Corporation has more employees than the Commercial building construction general median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 5.7 5.7 5 0 0
2016 4.8 4.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NJ · Fairfield

4,692 Commercial building construction general contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 88 employers in Fairfield, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Paul Risk Associates, Inc. 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fite Construction Company, LLC 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSI 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pennsy Transportation 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cogen Technologies Linden Venture LP 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACE- Bridgeton Operations 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACE-Cape May Courthouse Operations 56 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Township Department of Water Pollution Control (Sewer) 56 FTE
CITY-NEAR Middle Atlantic Products-Fairfield 495 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legrand AV Inc. 345 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1175 - Fairfield 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Weiss-Aug Surgical Products 241 FTE
NAT-TCR Ag Processing Inc 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Feintool Cincinnati Inc. Joslyn Rd. 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR McCraith Beverages 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mock Woodworking Company LLC 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE S10161 - St Johns Hauling 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Martin Sprocket & Gear 33 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Texas Electrical Solutions, Corp. 56 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ryder ICDC - 4965 56 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.