Machine bases, metal, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc.

Milwaukee, WI · ~26 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. runs at 99% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Machine bases, metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc.: 3.3 TCR = 99% of Machine bases, metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. safety composite

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2023

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. injury rate improved

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc.'s TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=4.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Milwaukee, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 99% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/73
  • PHOTO SteelCrest Corporation
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SteelCrest Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. averages 3.3 TCR (99% of the Machine bases, metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=4.4 · 2019=0 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. falls in its industry

827 Machine bases, metal, manufact establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 73 Machine bases, metal, manufact employers in Wisconsin.

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc.
Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. (26 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Pro Engineering and Manufacturing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Machine bases, metal, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 8.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 4.4 4.4 1 0 0
2016 3.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · WI · Milwaukee

827 Machine bases, metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SteelCrest Corporation 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR EMRManufacturing 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Latitude Corp Tuscon 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Forks (West) 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE WORZELLA & SONS, INC. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring Grove Dairy 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ross Soil Service LLC 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE ABS 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Rochling Industrial Mt. Pleasant 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Schirm USA, Inc. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Horn Lake 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR AFCO Performance Group 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Smt Industries 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Control Devices Inc. 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cell Culture Company LLC 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Electric Coop., Inc. 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.