Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing · Ohio

Process Technology

Name: Process Technology Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Mentor, OH · ~147 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

A
Excellent Safety Record: 1.5
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Process Technology runs at 45% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Process Technology: 1.5 TCR = 45% of Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Process Technology safety composite

Process Technology scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Process Technology: 2.1 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2023

Process Technology's TCR rose 0.4 from 2.1 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Mentor, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 45% of ind

DART 1.8 DART
RANK #12/55
PHOTO John Bean Technologies
BOOK 3y book
INJ 7 inj
SIZE ~147 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: John Bean Technologies (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.5
John Bean Tech

1.5
B&P Littleford

1.5
Montaplast Nor

1.5
Simpson Techno

1.5

What this shows Process Technology averages 1.5 TCR (45% of the Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Process Technology TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2018=0 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Process Technology falls in its industry

448 Chemical processing machinery establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

Grade A

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 55 Chemical processing machinery employers in Ohio.

Process Technology (147 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Process Technology has more employees than the Chemical processing machinery and equipm median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2023	2.4	1.8	4
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2016	2.1	2.1	3

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · OH · Mentor

448 Chemical processing machinery and equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 180 employers in Mentor, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	John Bean Technologies	LAKELAND, FL	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	B&P Littleford LLC	SAGINAW, MI	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Montaplast North America	FRANKFORT, KY	1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Simpson Technologies Corporation	AURORA, IL	1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Shelly Northeast construction	TWINSBURG	147 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Gerken Paving, Inc.	NAPOLEON	147 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Zanesville (750 Airport Road) OH Plant	ZANESVILLE	147 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Samuel Adams Cincinnati Brewery	CINCINNATI	147 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Steris HQ	Mentor	835 FTE
CITY-NEAR	STERIS	Mentor	612 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Avery Dennison - Materials Group Building 22	Mentor	612 FTE
CITY-NEAR	The Lincoln Electric Company - Mentor	Mentor	514 FTE
NAT-TCR	Texas Best Block - HOUB	Alleyton, TX	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	40286 Capstone Gordon Food Service	Brighton, MI	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	South Carolina	Rock Hill, SC	1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR	Waupaca-Accent	Waupaca, WI	1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Marshall	Marshall, MO	147 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Quikrete - Ont	Corona, CA	147 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Main Office - 01	Carson, CA	147 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Concept Laboratories	Chicago, IL	147 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.