Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) · Georgia

Processing plant

Name: Processing plant Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Douglas, GA · ~906 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 1.8
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Processing plant runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) workplace, earning a grade B.

Processing plant: 1.8 TCR = 55% of Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Processing plant safety composite

Processing plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 54%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2019

Processing plant injury rate improved

Processing plant's TCR fell 2.3 from 3.1 in 2016 to 0.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.33× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311615 · Douglas, GA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 55% of ind

DART 0.6 DART
RANK #20/67
PHOTO J & J Enterprises, LLC
BOOK 4y book
INJ 60 inj
SIZE ~906 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: J & J Enterprises, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

This site

1.8
J & J Enterpri

1.8
OKF Newlon War

1.8
Salisbury Plan

1.8
Smithfield St.

1.8

What this shows Processing plant averages 1.8 TCR (55% of the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) BLS benchmark).

Processing plant TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=1.6 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Processing plant falls in its industry

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, f establishments

Safer than 81% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 67 Chickens, processing, fresh, f employers in Georgia.

Processing plant (906 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 619 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Processing plant has more employees than the Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, can median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2019	0.8	0.6	7
2018	1.7	1.0	15
2017	1.6	0.3	13
2016	3.1	1.7	25

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311615 · GA · Douglas

509 Chickens, processing, fresh, frozen, canned, or cooked (except baby and pet food) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 67 employers in Douglas, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	J & J Enterprises, LLC	MORTON, MS	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	OKF Newlon Warehouse	FORT SMITH, AR	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Salisbury Plant	SALISBURY, MD	1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Smithfield St. James, MN	ST. JAMES, MN	1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	WM 6055	MONROE	903 FTE
STATE-SIZE	HomeNurse	GRIFFIN	910 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Decostar	CARROLLTON	912 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Century Center	ATLANTA	899 FTE
CITY-NEAR	CRH Healthcare INC	Douglas	1,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR	WM 6010	Douglas	988 FTE
CITY-NEAR	6010	Douglas	965 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Pilgrims	Douglas	890 FTE
NAT-TCR	TownePlace Suites Ft. Lauderdale Weston	Ft. Lauderdale, FL	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Elementray	Norwood, MN	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	Hotel Indigo Asheville	Asheville, NC	1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR	GeoStabilization International	Grand Junction, CO	1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE	WIPP	Carlsbad, NM	906 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Big Lots HQ Main Building - HQ01	Columbus, OH	906 FTE
NAT-SIZE	4818-ILCS	Bolingbrook, IL	906 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Scs 1860 Outer Loop - 3756 (Kyvle)	Louisville, KY	906 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.