Dishwasher detergents manufacturing · Kansas

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant

Kansas City, KS · ~292 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Dishwasher detergents manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Dishwasher detergents manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant safety composite

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant: 0.3 → 0.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 0.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2017

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant's TCR rose 0.4 from 0.3 in 2016 to 0.7 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325611 · Kansas City, KS AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO Chemetall US Inc.
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~292 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Chemetall US Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Dishwasher detergents manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2017=0.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant falls in its industry

240 Dishwasher detergents manufact establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Dishwasher detergents manufact employers in Kansas.

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant (292 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant
Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant (292 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Procter and Gamble Manufacturing - Kansas City Soap Plant has more employees than the Dishwasher detergents manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.7 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.3 0.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325611 · KS · Kansas City

240 Dishwasher detergents manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 367 employers in Kansas City, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Chemetall US Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stepan Company Fieldsboro 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greensboro Blend Plant 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Procter & Gamble 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jeffrey Energy Center 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1507 292 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bagcraft Packaging-Baxter Springs 293 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 2131 293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MKC6 3,116 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MKC6 2,912 FTE
CITY-NEAR Fairfax Assembly and Stamping 2,772 FTE
CITY-NEAR PROVIDENCE MEDICAL CENTER 1,091 FTE
NAT-TCR Textron Specialized Vehicles - EZGO Sales 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR TRW Automotive-Atkins 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 47 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR CN Atlanta 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tampa Bay Trane 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Hare (Iloha) 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nationwide Office Cleaners, LLC 292 FTE
NAT-SIZE Donan Engineering 292 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.