Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) · California

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company

Oxnard, CA · ~318 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company runs at 28% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) workplace, earning a grade A.

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company: 0.9 TCR = 28% of Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company safety composite

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company held a steady TCR band

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.9 in 2019 to 0.9 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.9 · 2020=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322121 · Oxnard, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 28% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO ICP United Roofing, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~318 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ICP United Roofing, Eutaw (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company averages 0.9 TCR (28% of the Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company TCR series: 2019=0.9 · 2020=0.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company falls in its industry

317 Paper mills (except newsprint, establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Paper mills (except newsprint, employers in California.

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company (318 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company
Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company (318 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 146 employees and a TCR of 2.2

Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company has more employees than the Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.9 0.6 2 1 0
2019 0.9 0.3 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322121 · CA · Oxnard

317 Paper mills (except newsprint, uncoated groundwood paper mills) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 303 employers in Oxnard, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ICP United Roofing, Eutaw 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Soundview Paper Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wisco Envelope Company 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR ST Paper 1, LLC 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Grimmius Cattle Company, Inc. - Home Ranch 318 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alston Construction Company, Inc. 318 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doty Bros. Equipment Co. 318 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Dutra Group 318 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - OXR1 2,474 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Oxnard 1,753 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030383 1,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. John's Regional Medical Center 1,352 FTE
NAT-TCR Ridges Surgery Center 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate/Shop 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kent KT 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Minnetonka 6000 Clearwater ABRC - AFG 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vcc, LLC 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE Guayama, Puerto Rico 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE POR 318 FTE
NAT-SIZE DI - T44/34/6 CLS NAS Whiting Field 318 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.