Tinfoil not made in rolling mills · Minnesota

Product Fabricators

Pine City, MN · ~45 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Product Fabricators runs at 502% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Tinfoil not made in rolling mills workplace, earning a grade F.

Product Fabricators: 16.6 TCR = 502% of Tinfoil not made in rolling mills BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Product Fabricators safety composite

Product Fabricators scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.4

2018→2024

Product Fabricators injury rate improved

Product Fabricators's TCR fell 16.4 from 30.4 in 2018 to 14.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 30.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=30.4 · 2019=18.1 · 2020=10.3 · 2021=15.1 · 2022=17.4 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=14.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332999 · Pine City, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.6 · 502% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #37/39
  • PHOTO Cotterman Company - …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cotterman Company - Pennsylvania Division (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Product Fabricators in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Product Fabricators averages 16.6 TCR (502% of the Tinfoil not made in rolling mills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Product Fabricators TCR series: 2018=30.4 · 2019=18.1 · 2020=10.3 · 2021=15.1 · 2022=17.4 · 2023=10.6 · 2024=14 · BLS 3.3

Where Product Fabricators falls in its industry

827 Tinfoil not made in rolling mi establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 39 Tinfoil not made in rolling mi employers in Minnesota.

Product Fabricators (45 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Product Fabricators
Product Fabricators (45 employees, TCR 16.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Product Fabricators has fewer employees than the Tinfoil not made in rolling mills median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.0 2.8 2 3 0
2023 10.6 5.3 3 1 0
2022 17.4 6.5 6 2 0
2021 15.1 7.5 4 2 0
2020 10.3 5.2 2 2 0
2019 18.1 11.3 8 0 0
2018 30.4 17.7 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332999 · MN · Pine City

827 Tinfoil not made in rolling mills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 17 employers in Pine City, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cotterman Company - Pennsylvania Division 16.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR EAU CLAIRE PALLET RACK - 1008 16.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cleco 16.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chancey Metals, LLC (Suemac Facility) 16.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE District 45 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allstar Construction Commercial Op Co, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Doran Construction Company, LLC 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hasslen Construction Company, Inc. 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2367 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2367 279 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISD 578 234 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pine Technical and Community College 150 FTE
NAT-TCR Kre-Bsl Husky Worcester Operation LLC 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tracy's Quality Painting Inc. 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR voestalpine Roll Forming Corporation Indiana Division 16.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0402 Plano 16.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thomas Street Piggly Wiggly INC 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sacramento Suburban Water District 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Thurgood Excavating, Inc 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brichetto Brothers 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.