Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming · Minnesota

Production Services - Jackson

Jackson, MN · ~24 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Production Services - Jackson runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming workplace, earning a grade C.

Production Services - Jackson: 4.4 TCR = 97% of Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Production Services - Jackson safety composite

Production Services - Jackson scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 4.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Production Services - Jackson: 0.0 → 6.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 14.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Production Services - Jackson's TCR rose 6.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 6.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112210 · Jackson, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/27
  • PHOTO Tosh Pork
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tosh Pork (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Production Services - Jackson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Production Services - Jackson averages 4.4 TCR (97% of the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Production Services - Jackson TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=10.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.3 · 2022=14.7 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Production Services - Jackson falls in its industry

280 Hog and pig (including breedin establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 27 Hog and pig (including breedin employers in Minnesota.

Production Services - Jackson (24 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Production Services - Jackson
Production Services - Jackson (24 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 26 employees and a TCR of 7.7

Production Services - Jackson has fewer employees than the Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.7 0.0 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 14.7 0.0 4 0 0
2021 7.3 0.0 2 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 10.6 3.5 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112210 · MN · Jackson

280 Hog and pig (including breeding, farrowing, nursery, and finishing activities) farming employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 30 employers in Jackson, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tosh Pork 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPG TEXAS COMPLEX -EST 4.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Schwartz Farms Timber Ridge 12347 445th Street Leigh NE 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sleepy Eye Feedmill 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Dairy, Cottonwood Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE WPI-Office 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pipestone Repairs and Maintenance 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE M1 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR AGCO : Jackson 884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jackson 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR HitchDoc 146 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN110 TSE 146 FTE
NAT-TCR A&R Services 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Tithonus Tyrone 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sentara Rockingham Memorial Hospital 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockville 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1550 Lkq 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE PENN Acoustics, Inc. 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1230 LKQ Pick Your Part 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #66 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.