Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) manufacturing · Oklahoma

Professional Fabricators, Inc.

Tulsa, OK · ~25 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Professional Fabricators, Inc. runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Professional Fabricators, Inc.: 4.8 TCR = 144% of Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Professional Fabricators, Inc. safety composite

Professional Fabricators, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 33%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Professional Fabricators, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Professional Fabricators, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 15.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=15.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332410 · Tulsa, OK ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 144% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #15/25
  • PHOTO DC Fabricators, Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DC Fabricators, Inc (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oklahoma employers → · Look up another →

Professional Fabricators, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Professional Fabricators, Inc. averages 4.8 TCR (144% of the Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Professional Fabricators, Inc. TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=15.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=8.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Professional Fabricators, Inc. falls in its industry

171 Aftercoolers (i.e., heat excha establishments

Safer than 33% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oklahoma alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 25 Aftercoolers (i.e., heat excha employers in Oklahoma.

Professional Fabricators, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 2.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Professional Fabricators, Inc.
Professional Fabricators, Inc. (25 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 2.9

Professional Fabricators, Inc. has fewer employees than the Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) man median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.5 0.0 3 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 15.3 0.0 4 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332410 · OK · Tulsa

171 Aftercoolers (i.e., heat exchangers) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,320 rated employers in Oklahoma with headcount on file · 1,004 employers in Tulsa, OK · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DC Fabricators, Inc 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alfa Laval Inc. Lykens (loc code: PALYKE) 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR API Heat Transfer - Iron Ridge 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Graham Corporation 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ovintiv USA Inc. - Scoop Office 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE McAlester Office 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ringwood Field Office 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Quintin Little Company Inc 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Francis Hospital, Inc. 6,668 FTE
CITY-NEAR H&P IDC - U.S. Land 6,014 FTE
CITY-NEAR TUL-TULSA-MAINTENANCE BASE 5,184 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-TUL-TULSA-TUL-TRML 4,794 FTE
NAT-TCR San Clemente Cove 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Channel Fish Processing Co Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Global Texas Concessions 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Component plant 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE National Flange & Fitting Co 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE New West Development, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omni Community Health Nashville 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foster Machining, Inc. 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.