Janitorial services · Ohio

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc.

Cincinnati, OH · ~254 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Janitorial services workplace, earning a grade A.

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc.: 1.2 TCR = 26% of Janitorial services BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. safety composite

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.19 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2017→2021

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. injury rate improved

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.9 from 0.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 2.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.9 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.2 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #28/136
  • PHOTO JLL Moderna Norwood
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~254 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JLL Moderna Norwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. averages 1.2 TCR (26% of the Janitorial services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0.9 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. falls in its industry

4,064 Janitorial services establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 136 Janitorial services employers in Ohio.

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. (254 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc.
Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. (254 employees, TCR 1.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Professional Maintenance of Cincinnati, Inc. has more employees than the Janitorial services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 2.2 1.1 3 1 0
2018 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2017 0.9 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · OH · Cincinnati

4,064 Janitorial services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JLL Moderna Norwood 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR GBM Services, LLC 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pacific View 1.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tennova Healthcare - Clarksville 1.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Forge Biologics 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE JBT Sandusky 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE DRB Akron 254 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acme Fresh Market #14 254 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Chart Lifecycle 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Victoria's Secret Store (644) 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Oxford, PA 1.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastside 1.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Roche Bros. Supermarkets - Wellesley 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE 10 River Park Plaza 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ocala Hyundai 254 FTE
NAT-SIZE Margate Health and Rehabilitation Center 254 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.