Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats · Texas

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC

Houston, TX · ~33 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.4
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC runs at 513% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats workplace, earning a grade F.

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC: 17.4 TCR = 513% of Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats BLS 3.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC safety composite

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−37.9

2017→2019

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC injury rate improved

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC's TCR fell 37.9 from 41.8 in 2017 to 3.9 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 41.8 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=41.8 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=3.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Houston, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.4 · 513% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1874/1899
  • PHOTO Castro
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~33 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Castro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC averages 17.4 TCR (513% of the Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC TCR series: 2017=41.8 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=3.9 · BLS 3.4

Where Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC falls in its industry

30,654 Delicatessens primarily retail establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1874 safest of 1899 Delicatessens primarily retail employers in Texas.

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC (33 employees, TCR 17.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC
Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC (33 employees, TCR 17.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Progreso LMMM Houston# 49, LLC has fewer employees than the Delicatessens primarily retailing a rang median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 3.9 0.0 1 0 0
2018 6.7 6.7 2 0 0
2017 41.8 41.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · TX · Houston

30,654 Delicatessens primarily retailing a range of grocery items and meats employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Castro 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6962-SWY-0025-0025-00939 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillsboro-Oak St #028 17.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DWT 44 17.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE SW Seed Company New Deal 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Houston 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tejas Feeders LLC 33 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrims LIVE OPERATIONS 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Pennington Gardens 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Comstock Creamery LLC 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Divvy 17.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZCHM 17.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Morton Grove Assisted Living 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE GRG Enterprises, LLC 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swedish Radia Edmonds 33 FTE
NAT-SIZE 763 - Phoenix 33 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.