Pulp products, molded, manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania

Hazelton, PA · ~162 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Pulp products, molded, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania: 4.0 TCR = 123% of Pulp products, molded, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania safety composite

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.1

2017→2023

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania injury rate improved

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania's TCR fell 3.1 from 7.6 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.6 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Hazelton, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 123% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #11/20
  • PHOTO Greenfiber Decatur IL
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~162 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Greenfiber Decatur IL (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Progressive Converting Pennsylvania averages 4.0 TCR (123% of the Pulp products, molded, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania TCR series: 2017=7.6 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=1.3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=3.1 · 2023=4.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Progressive Converting Pennsylvania falls in its industry

236 Pulp products, molded, manufac establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 20 Pulp products, molded, manufac employers in Pennsylvania.

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania (162 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Progressive Converting Pennsylvania
Progressive Converting Pennsylvania (162 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Progressive Converting Pennsylvania has more employees than the Pulp products, molded, manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.6 3.3 7 0 0
2022 3.1 3.1 4 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 6 0 0
2020 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2019 4.5 4.5 8 0 0
2017 7.6 7.6 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · PA · Hazelton

236 Pulp products, molded, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 18 employers in Hazelton, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Greenfiber Decatur IL 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Cellulose Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Food Merchandising : MACON 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hillside RTS 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wilkinsburg 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE PHW 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE LINDE CORPORATION 162 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smucker Company 162 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : AVP1 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Simmons Hazelton 218 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx Supply Chain Wegman PA 194 FTE
CITY-NEAR 106081 159 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1513 GOFFSTOWN, NH 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR LH- 6 St.Andrew's Lane 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Graceville 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Food World 794 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Irvine Aero Ca 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Custom Metal Fabricating, Inc 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwestern Wire, Inc. 162 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interstate Brick 162 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.