Commercial printing (except screen, books) · Ohio

Progressive Printers

Dayton, OH · ~42 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Progressive Printers runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial printing (except screen, books) workplace, earning a grade A.

Progressive Printers: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Progressive Printers safety composite

Progressive Printers scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2016→2024

Progressive Printers injury rate improved

Progressive Printers's TCR fell 2.5 from 2.5 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.5 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Dayton, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #43/138
  • PHOTO Boxcar Press Inc
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Boxcar Press Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Progressive Printers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Progressive Printers averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Commercial printing (except screen, books) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Progressive Printers TCR series: 2016=2.5 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=3.8 · 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Progressive Printers falls in its industry

2,001 Commercial printing (except sc establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 138 Commercial printing (except sc employers in Ohio.

Progressive Printers (42 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Progressive Printers
Progressive Printers (42 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Progressive Printers has fewer employees than the Commercial printing (except screen, book median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.3 0.0 1 0 0
2022 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2021 3.8 3.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.5 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · OH · Dayton

2,001 Commercial printing (except screen, books) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Boxcar Press Inc 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCC Label - Niles 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Preferred Marketing Solutions, Inc. 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Taylor Comms - Murfreesboro TN - 0222-TNMU1 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Goshen Pullets 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consolidated Cooperative (Mount Gilead facility) 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbus Storeroom Annex Stn 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2948_12474 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR FIBA Technologies - E. Greenville PA 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Delta Toc 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tipton Transmission Plant 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sterling Heights Assembly Plant 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE USI (Rogers, MN) 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unified Packaging, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mt Clemens Sales Branch 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lansing Sales Branch 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.