Meal delivery programs · California

Project Angel Food

Name: Project Angel Food Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Los Angeles, CA · ~61 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

F
Failing Safety Record: 20.7
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 1
Fatality

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Project Angel Food runs at 544% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Meal delivery programs workplace, earning a grade F.

Project Angel Food: 20.7 TCR = 544% of Meal delivery programs BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Project Angel Food safety composite

Project Angel Food scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

1/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): F 20.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers
DART rate: F 23.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers
Fatalities: F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Project Angel Food: 13.7 → 27.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 27.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2020

Project Angel Food's TCR rose 14.0 from 13.7 in 2019 to 27.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 624210 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 20.7 · 544% of ind

DART 24.0 DART
RANK #18/19
PHOTO NON-PROFIT
BOOK 2y book
INJ 10 inj
SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NON-PROFIT (3.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

River Bend Foo

26.6
This site

20.7
NON-PROFIT

17.3
Food Bank of t

15.8
Second Harvest

14.2

What this shows Project Angel Food averages 20.7 TCR (544% of the Meal delivery programs BLS benchmark).

Project Angel Food TCR series: 2019=13.7 · 2020=27.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Project Angel Food falls in its industry

147 Meal delivery programs establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

Grade F

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 19 Meal delivery programs employers in California.

Project Angel Food (61 employees, TCR 20.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Project Angel Food has fewer employees than the Meal delivery programs median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2020	27.7	24.0	5	10	1
2019	13.7	11.4	5	1	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

624210 · CA · Los Angeles

147 Meal delivery programs employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	NON-PROFIT	EUREKA, CA	17.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Food Bank of the Rio Grande Valley, Inc.	PHARR, TX	15.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR	River Bend Foodbank	DAVENPORT, IA	26.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Second Harvest Food Bank	MUNCIE, IN	14.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Silveira Farms	ATWATER	61 FTE
STATE-SIZE	La Brucherie Produce, LLC	EL CENTRO	61 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Olds Ranch	OXNARD	61 FTE
STATE-SIZE	1750 Production Office	AROMAS	61 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Live Nation Worldwide, Inc.	Los Angeles	50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR	UC Los Angeles	Los Angeles	40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR	LADWP	Los Angeles	11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Los Angeles Department of Water and Power	Los Angeles	10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR	6400-Swy 0024 0077	Marysville, WA	20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	381768-Col-Livingston Sta	Columbus, OH	20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Metro Health Foundation of MA, Inc. D/B/A The Bostonian Nursing Care & Rehabilitation Center	Dorchester, MA	20.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Bickford of Sioux City II	Sioux City, IA	20.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Alliance Industries - Waupaca	Waupaca, WI	61 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Corporate Office	Maryland Heights, MO	61 FTE
NAT-SIZE	H&M Constructors Industrial	Asheville, NC	61 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Hah07-Bfspr-Auburn Hills Crowne Plaza	Auburn Hills, MI	61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.