Electric motors, wiring supplies, and lighting fixtures merchant wholesalers · Texas

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270)

Houston, TX · ~26 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) runs at 86% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric motors, wiring supplies, and lighting fixtures merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270): 1.9 TCR = 86% of Electric motors, wiring supplies, and lighting fixtures merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) safety composite

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.8

2016→2017

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) injury rate improved

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270)'s TCR fell 3.8 from 3.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.8 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.8 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423610 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 1.9 · 86% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #59/133
  • PHOTO Rexel USA, Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~26 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rexel USA, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) averages 1.9 TCR (86% of the Electric motors, wiring supplies, and lighting fixtures merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) TCR series: 2016=3.8 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) falls in its industry

1,190 Electric motors, wiring suppli establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #59 safest of 133 Electric motors, wiring suppli employers in Texas.

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) (26 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270)
Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) (26 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Project Lighting Co. (Pc3270) has fewer employees than the Electric motors, wiring supplies, and li median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 3.8 3.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423610 · TX · Houston

1,190 Electric motors, wiring supplies, and lighting fixtures merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rexel USA, Inc 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Border States Electric - Odessa 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Richelieu America LTD / Kansas City Compi Distributors 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTORS (PC4442) 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Belding Farms 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Friona Industries, L.P. 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Keeling Cattle Feeders 26 FTE
STATE-SIZE Descanso Dairy, LLC 26 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR 33- Omaha 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Westin Buckhead Atlanta 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Goodrich - Turbine Fuel Technologies- Carroll IA 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR CN Irvine 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 0765 - Roseburg, or 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0391 - Avondale, Az 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0215 - Philadelphia, Pa 26 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0213 - Jacksonville West, Fl 26 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.