Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Texas

Pronto Delivery Services LLC

Arlington, TX · ~100 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pronto Delivery Services LLC runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade B.

Pronto Delivery Services LLC: 2.9 TCR = 64% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pronto Delivery Services LLC safety composite

Pronto Delivery Services LLC scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

83/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2016→2020

Pronto Delivery Services LLC injury rate improved

Pronto Delivery Services LLC's TCR fell 7.7 from 7.7 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 7.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.7 · 2019=1.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Arlington, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #4/118
  • PHOTO 2712 W Main Street
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 2712 W Main Street (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Pronto Delivery Services LLC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pronto Delivery Services LLC averages 2.9 TCR (64% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pronto Delivery Services LLC TCR series: 2016=7.7 · 2019=1 · 2020=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Pronto Delivery Services LLC falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 118 Delivery service (except as pa employers in Texas.

Pronto Delivery Services LLC (100 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Pronto Delivery Services LLC
Pronto Delivery Services LLC (100 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Pronto Delivery Services LLC has more employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 1.0 1.0 1 0 0
2016 7.7 7.7 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · TX · Arlington

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 475 employers in Arlington, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 2712 W Main Street 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZOTT 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR UVDV 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 5s Pro Logistics 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Revol Greens - TX 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dakota Utility Contractors LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE McClung Energy Services, LLC 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE HCI03-FPC 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR GM Arlington Assembly 4,769 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Arlington Warehouse 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR TX Arlington 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health Physician Group 3,831 FTE
NAT-TCR HSP - Homewood Suites Pinehurst 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Command Packaging 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Greater Albany Public School District Office 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hillyard Denver 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Colonial Bag Company, Inc 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Department of Corrections - Macomb Probation 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunter Panels - Montgomery 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Apple Valley Center 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.