Real estate rental or leasing of residential building · California

Property Management Associates

Los Angeles, CA · ~94 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Property Management Associates runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Real estate rental or leasing of residential building workplace, earning a grade D.

Property Management Associates: 2.1 TCR = 149% of Real estate rental or leasing of residential building BLS 1.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Property Management Associates safety composite

Property Management Associates scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

72/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−468.1

2020→2023

Property Management Associates injury rate improved

Property Management Associates's TCR fell 468.1 from 470.2 in 2020 to 2.1 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 470.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=470.2 · 2023=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531110 · Los Angeles, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.1 · 149% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/113
  • PHOTO Davis Development Inc
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~94 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Davis Development Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Property Management Associates in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Property Management Associates averages 2.1 TCR (149% of the Real estate rental or leasing of residential building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Property Management Associates TCR series: 2020=470.2 · 2023=2.1 · BLS 1.4

Where Property Management Associates falls in its industry

1,100 Real estate rental or leasing establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 113 Real estate rental or leasing employers in California.

Property Management Associates (94 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Property Management Associates
Property Management Associates (94 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Property Management Associates has more employees than the Real estate rental or leasing of residen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.1 0.0 2 0 0
2020 470.2 470.2 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531110 · CA · Los Angeles

1,100 Real estate rental or leasing of residential building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 2,064 employers in Los Angeles, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Davis Development Inc 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acclaim Living 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR RXR NY PM FOXTROT LLC 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wesley Woods Towers 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE MORALES FARM LABOR SERVICE 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fondomonte CA - Blythe Farm 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robinson Enterprises, Inc 94 FTE
STATE-SIZE Javier Martinez Contracting 94 FTE
CITY-NEAR Live Nation Worldwide, Inc. 50,317 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC Los Angeles 40,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR LADWP 11,717 FTE
CITY-NEAR Los Angeles Department of Water and Power 10,346 FTE
NAT-TCR Don Davis Nissan Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1158 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pedro Falcon Electrical Contractors Inc 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #2830 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Impact Plastics 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hotel Monaco Seattle 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quikrete - Chi 94 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advantage MetalWork & Finishing, LLC 94 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.