Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing · Texas

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls

Houston, TX · ~74 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls runs at 54% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls: 1.8 TCR = 54% of Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls safety composite

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 1.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.5

2018→2019

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls injury rate improved

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls's TCR fell 3.5 from 3.5 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.5 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.5 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333132 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.8 · 54% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #143/208
  • PHOTO DynaEnergetics US In…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~74 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DynaEnergetics US Inc. - Houston TX Corporate Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls averages 1.8 TCR (54% of the Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls TCR series: 2018=3.5 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls falls in its industry

316 Drilling equipment, oil and ga establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #143 safest of 208 Drilling equipment, oil and ga employers in Texas.

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls (74 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls
Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls (74 employees, TCR 1.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Proserv Sommermeyer Drilling Controls has fewer employees than the Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-ty median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.5 3.5 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333132 · TX · Houston

316 Drilling equipment, oil and gas field-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DynaEnergetics US Inc. - Houston TX Corporate Office 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Terra Sonic International 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR NOV Hydra Rig 1.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCR Oil Tools 1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Acrosa Crushed Concrete 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tolk Station-124 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ft. Bend Service Center CP18 74 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bluebonnet Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Headquarters and Corporate Services 74 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Rchc Opelousas La Service Site 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR AHB Tooling & Machinery, Inc. 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Rocky Mountain District : SVC-Denver CO-USA 1.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 249 - Matthews 1.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pottsville PA14 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE US - Branch Network : 0753 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regional Health Distribution Center 74 FTE
NAT-SIZE Imperial Youngstown 74 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.