Airport baggage handling services · Michigan

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT

Romulus, MI · ~128 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT runs at 97% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Airport baggage handling services workplace, earning a grade C.

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT: 4.4 TCR = 97% of Airport baggage handling services BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT safety composite

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

63/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2016→2024

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT injury rate improved

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT's TCR fell 8.2 from 10.4 in 2016 to 2.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.4 · 2017=7.0 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=11.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Romulus, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 97% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/33
  • PHOTO MIACCB706 MIA - B706
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~128 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MIACCB706 MIA - B706 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prospect Airport Services DTW NT averages 4.4 TCR (97% of the Airport baggage handling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT TCR series: 2016=10.4 · 2017=7 · 2018=4.1 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=11.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=1.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Prospect Airport Services DTW NT falls in its industry

1,555 Airport baggage handling servi establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 33 Airport baggage handling servi employers in Michigan.

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT (128 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Prospect Airport Services DTW NT
Prospect Airport Services DTW NT (128 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Prospect Airport Services DTW NT has more employees than the Airport baggage handling services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.2 0.0 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 11.7 2.0 6 0 0
2019 2.6 1.7 3 0 0
2018 4.1 1.6 5 0 0
2017 7.0 2.6 6 2 0
2016 10.4 6.1 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · MI · Romulus

1,555 Airport baggage handling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 199 employers in Romulus, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MIACCB706 MIA - B706 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001274 BED - 274 L.G. HANSCOM FIELD 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001202 IAD - 202 WASHINGTON DULLES INTL AIRPORT 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR STL002 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Purpose Point Harvesting LLC 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lombardo Homes of SE Michigan 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Boldt Company - MI 128 FTE
STATE-SIZE Henkels & McCoy, Michigan - Gaylord 128 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : DTW1 3,720 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - DTW1 3,502 FTE
CITY-NEAR Romulus Powertrain 1,336 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Motors Romulus 1,037 FTE
NAT-TCR Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sanders-Nursing Home 5453 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR 050-NSH 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Cal-Maine Foods Inc. Organic 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Carilion Clinic Tazewell Community Hospital Co. 09 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Essex Pavilion 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #5830 128 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #6528 128 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.