Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local · New Jersey

Prospect Transportation Inc.

Carlstadt, NJ · ~153 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prospect Transportation Inc. runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local workplace, earning a grade B.

Prospect Transportation Inc.: 3.0 TCR = 66% of Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS 4.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prospect Transportation Inc. safety composite

Prospect Transportation Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Prospect Transportation Inc.: 3.2 → 4.6 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 4.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.36× in 2023

Prospect Transportation Inc.'s TCR rose 1.4 from 3.2 in 2016 to 4.6 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484220 · Carlstadt, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 3.0 · 66% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #11/18
  • PHOTO Advantage Tank Lines…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~153 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Advantage Tank Lines 20175 Harlingen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Prospect Transportation Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prospect Transportation Inc. averages 3.0 TCR (66% of the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prospect Transportation Inc. TCR series: 2016=3.2 · 2017=2.3 · 2018=2.7 · 2021=1.1 · 2022=4 · 2023=4.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Prospect Transportation Inc. falls in its industry

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 18 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemica employers in New Jersey.

Prospect Transportation Inc. (153 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Prospect Transportation Inc.
Prospect Transportation Inc. (153 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 42 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Prospect Transportation Inc. has more employees than the Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.6 4.0 8 0 1
2022 4.0 4.0 7 0 0
2021 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2018 2.7 2.7 6 0 0
2017 2.3 2.3 5 0 0
2016 3.2 2.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484220 · NJ · Carlstadt

1,130 Tanker trucking (e.g., chemical, juice, milk, petroleum), local employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 78 employers in Carlstadt, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Advantage Tank Lines 20175 Harlingen 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greenbush Logistics - Columbus 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR A-C Motor Express LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kenan Transport 50066 Richmond 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Avon Contractors 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allied Extruders, Inc. 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE McGrory Glass, Inc. 153 FTE
STATE-SIZE GlacierPoint Swedesboro 153 FTE
CITY-NEAR TRIBECA OVEN 362 FTE
CITY-NEAR Safway Atlantic, LLC - New Jersey 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Trading Co. Inc. 295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unimac Graphics, LLC 227 FTE
NAT-TCR Dentsply Sirona Orthodontics 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR High School (200) 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR First Management, Inc. 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sapphire Hospitality 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100787 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100695 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stop & Shop 100629 153 FTE
NAT-SIZE Otterbein St. Marys 153 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.