Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), residential building · California

ProTec Building Services

San Diego, CA · ~379 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ProTec Building Services runs at 134% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), residential building workplace, earning a grade D.

ProTec Building Services: 5.1 TCR = 134% of Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), residential building BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ProTec Building Services safety composite

ProTec Building Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

ProTec Building Services: 1.4 → 8.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 8.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.69× in 2024

ProTec Building Services's TCR rose 7.2 from 1.4 in 2018 to 8.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236118 · San Diego, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 134% of ind

  • DART 8.6 DART
  • RANK #30/78
  • PHOTO SERVPRO of Chesterfi…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 136 inj
  • SIZE ~379 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SERVPRO of Chesterfield, Tri-Cities (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

ProTec Building Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ProTec Building Services averages 5.1 TCR (134% of the Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), residential building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ProTec Building Services TCR series: 2018=1.4 · 2019=3.1 · 2020=5.1 · 2021=3.4 · 2022=6.8 · 2023=7.2 · 2024=8.6 · BLS 3.8

Where ProTec Building Services falls in its industry

698 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 78 Addition, alteration and renov employers in California.

ProTec Building Services (379 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate ProTec Building Services
ProTec Building Services (379 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 41 employees and a TCR of 6.1

ProTec Building Services has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.6 8.6 35 2 0
2023 7.2 7.2 31 0 0
2022 6.8 6.8 24 0 0
2021 3.4 3.4 12 0 0
2020 5.1 5.1 17 0 0
2019 3.1 3.1 12 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236118 · CA · San Diego

698 Addition, alteration and renovation (i.e., construction), residential building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SERVPRO of Chesterfield, Tri-Cities 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mark Mariani Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR BOSS ROOFING-SIDING EXPERTS, INC 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR WEMO INDUSTRIES, INC 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lundberg Family Farms 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE Catalinos Berry Farms, LLC 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCL Construction Services Inc. 379 FTE
STATE-SIZE Drill Tech Drilling and Shoring Inc. 379 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR ZM Sheet Metal - Winchester 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR ABQ 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Haldex Brake Products Corp. 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Team Logistics Corporate 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tri-State Memorial Hospital 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE Viasat - Denver 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE Magellan Tulsa OTC OK 379 FTE
NAT-SIZE LDF Sales & Distributing, Inc. 379 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.