Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing · Ohio

Proto Plastics Inc.

Tipp City, OH · ~30 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Proto Plastics Inc. runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Proto Plastics Inc.: 3.5 TCR = 105% of Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Proto Plastics Inc. safety composite

Proto Plastics Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.8

2016→2023

Proto Plastics Inc. injury rate improved

Proto Plastics Inc.'s TCR fell 6.8 from 6.8 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 8.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.8 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=4.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326121 · Tipp City, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.5 · 105% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/19
  • PHOTO Engineered Materials…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~30 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Engineered Materials : Marion (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Proto Plastics Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Proto Plastics Inc. averages 3.5 TCR (105% of the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Proto Plastics Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.8 · 2017=8.9 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=4 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Proto Plastics Inc. falls in its industry

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 19 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tub employers in Ohio.

Proto Plastics Inc. (30 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Proto Plastics Inc.
Proto Plastics Inc. (30 employees, TCR 3.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Proto Plastics Inc. has fewer employees than the Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrig median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.0 0.0 1 0 0
2020 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 8.9 0.0 3 0 0
2016 6.8 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326121 · OH · Tipp City

202 Profile shapes (e.g., rod, tube), nonrigid plastics, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 54 employers in Tipp City, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Engineered Materials : Marion 3.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parkway Products Seneca South Carolina 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tailwind (IHM - Beaverton) 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grayline LLC 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tuente Farms Inc 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farm 3 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Trillium Farms Layer 6 30 FTE
STATE-SIZE Canton Hatchery 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR AN Tipp City Ohio 338 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer DC-805 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer DC-802 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR 802 - Tipp City GM 304 FTE
NAT-TCR J. Wilhelm Roofing Company Inc 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Windham Manufacturing Company Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR GT Technologies of Tennessee, Inc. 3.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Camco mfg., LLC #1 3.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Rubber Company Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stonegate Surgery Center, LP 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aire Sheet Metal, Inc. 30 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sauder Global Sourcing 30 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.