Molds for plastics and rubber working machinery manufacturing · Minnesota

Protolabs - Plant 1

Maple Plain, MN · ~27 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Protolabs - Plant 1 runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Molds for plastics and rubber working machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Protolabs - Plant 1: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Molds for plastics and rubber working machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Protolabs - Plant 1 safety composite

Protolabs - Plant 1 scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

69/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2018→2019

Protolabs - Plant 1 injury rate improved

Protolabs - Plant 1's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.0 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333511 · Maple Plain, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/14
  • PHOTO Technical Division
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~27 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Technical Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Protolabs - Plant 1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Protolabs - Plant 1 averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Molds for plastics and rubber working machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Protolabs - Plant 1 TCR series: 2018=4 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Protolabs - Plant 1 falls in its industry

216 Molds for plastics and rubber establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 14 Molds for plastics and rubber employers in Minnesota.

Protolabs - Plant 1 (27 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Protolabs - Plant 1
Protolabs - Plant 1 (27 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Protolabs - Plant 1 has fewer employees than the Molds for plastics and rubber working ma median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 4.0 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333511 · MN · Maple Plain

216 Molds for plastics and rubber working machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 17 employers in Maple Plain, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Technical Division 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR R & D Leverage 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Dynamic Group Inc - Foley 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caterpillar 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Featherstone Fruits and Vegetables LLC. 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Forest City Feedmill 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schwartz Farms PAP MN 27 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2011-Stanton, MN 27 FTE
CITY-NEAR Haven Homes 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR Branch 1 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maple Plain MN 106 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wenck Associates - Maple Plain 104 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1829 Greensboro, NC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR SwedishAmerican Health System-Belvidere Medical Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AmeriGas - Houston, TX Liquilux Acq 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR New Aqua, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE West LA Station Maintenance 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE West Valley Electric Sta Mtnc 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peoria - 548 27 FTE
NAT-SIZE Victory Packaging Phoenix 27 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.