Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass, plastics, rubber) manufacturing · Minnesota

Protolabs - Rosemount

Name: Protolabs - Rosemount Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Rosemount, MN · ~272 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 1.7
Avg TCR: 3.3
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Protolabs - Rosemount runs at 52% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass, plastics, rubber) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Protolabs - Rosemount: 1.7 TCR = 52% of Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass, plastics, rubber) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Protolabs - Rosemount safety composite

Protolabs - Rosemount scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 1.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers
DART rate: F 3.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Protolabs - Rosemount: 0.6 → 3.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.1 TCR · DART/TCR 1.83× in 2024

Protolabs - Rosemount's TCR rose 2.5 from 0.6 in 2018 to 3.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333511 · Rosemount, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 1.7 · 52% of ind

DART 3.1 DART
RANK #2/14
PHOTO Industrial Tool, Inc.
BOOK 4y book
INJ 19 inj
SIZE ~272 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Industrial Tool, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Pioneer Plasti

1.8
This site

1.7
Industrial Too

1.7
Engineered Pla

1.7
DME Co. LLC

1.7

What this shows Protolabs - Rosemount averages 1.7 TCR (52% of the Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass, plastics, rubber) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Protolabs - Rosemount TCR series: 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.6 · 2021=2.5 · 2024=3.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Protolabs - Rosemount falls in its industry

216 Molds for forming materials (e establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 14 Molds for forming materials (e employers in Minnesota.

Protolabs - Rosemount (272 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Protolabs - Rosemount has more employees than the Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2024	3.1	3.1	7
2021	2.5	1.6	8
2019	0.6	0.6	2
2018	0.6	0.3	2

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333511 · MN · Rosemount

216 Molds for forming materials (e.g., glass, plastics, rubber) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 60 employers in Rosemount, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Industrial Tool, Inc.	MINNEAPOLIS, MN	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Engineered Plastic Components-545	GRINNELL, IA	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	DME Co. LLC	MADISON HTS., MI	1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Pioneer Plastics, Inc	ST PAUL, MN	1.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Glenwood	GLENWOOD	272 FTE
STATE-SIZE	WM 1696	FERGUS FALLS	272 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Minnesota Office	MINNEAPOLIS	272 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Aetna Inc. - Plymouth, MN	PLYMOUTH	272 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Independent School District 196	Rosemount	4,172 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Flint Hills Resources	Rosemount	1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC	Rosemount	905 FTE
CITY-NEAR	ISD 917 Rosemount	Rosemount	559 FTE
NAT-TCR	GC America Inc.	Alsip, IL	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Crown Metal Manufacturing Company	Elmhurst, IL	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Hilo Hi	Keaau, HI	1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR	Aetna Roofing Corp	Trenton, NJ	1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Bexar Concrete Works I, Ltd	San Antonio, TX	272 FTE
NAT-SIZE	166 Gre1000	Greenwood, IN	272 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Nucor Steel Auburn, Inc	Auburn, NY	272 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Myers Park Country Club Inc	Charlotte, NC	272 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.