Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) · Minnesota

Providence Academy

Plymouth, MN · ~21 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Providence Academy runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) workplace, earning a grade C.

Providence Academy: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Providence Academy safety composite

Providence Academy scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Providence Academy held a steady TCR band

Providence Academy's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.0 TCR.

2017=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722310 · Plymouth, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/111
  • PHOTO Barclay's Whippany
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Barclay's Whippany (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Providence Academy in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Providence Academy averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Providence Academy TCR series: 2017=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.0

Where Providence Academy falls in its industry

6,952 Cafeteria food services contra establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 111 Cafeteria food services contra employers in Minnesota.

Providence Academy (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Providence Academy
Providence Academy (21 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Providence Academy has fewer employees than the Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722310 · MN · Plymouth

6,952 Cafeteria food services contractors (e.g., government office cafeterias, hospital cafeterias, school cafeterias) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 321 employers in Plymouth, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Barclay's Whippany 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOREHOUSE COLLEGE 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT BLOOMBERG 731 LEX PANTRY 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR SODEXO AT GRAMBLING RESIDENT DINING 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Barkley Landscapes 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main Location 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Allina Health Emergency Medical Services Buffalo 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linders Specialty Company 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lawrence Service LLC 3,881 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP SH Plymouth MN 2,084 FTE
CITY-NEAR EP / SH Plymouth MN 1,982 FTE
CITY-NEAR CN Plymouth 1,565 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Envision Printing, LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rittenhouse #054 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleveland Canvas Goods Mfg Co 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Frc Transportation Services 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hampton Inn & Suites Morgantown/University Town Centre 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.