Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

Providence Place of Hazleton

Drums, PA · ~73 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Providence Place of Hazleton runs at 262% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Providence Place of Hazleton: 9.9 TCR = 262% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Providence Place of Hazleton safety composite

Providence Place of Hazleton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−9.4

2021→2024

Providence Place of Hazleton injury rate improved

Providence Place of Hazleton's TCR fell 9.4 from 14.6 in 2021 to 5.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 14.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=14.6 · 2024=5.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Drums, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.9 · 262% of ind

  • DART 3.9 DART
  • RANK #156/233
  • PHOTO St. Augustine Planta…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: St. Augustine Plantation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Providence Place of Hazleton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Providence Place of Hazleton averages 9.9 TCR (262% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Providence Place of Hazleton TCR series: 2021=14.6 · 2024=5.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Providence Place of Hazleton falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #156 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

Providence Place of Hazleton (73 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Providence Place of Hazleton
Providence Place of Hazleton (73 employees, TCR 9.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Providence Place of Hazleton has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.2 3.9 3 1 0
2021 14.6 8.8 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Drums

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 7 employers in Drums, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR St. Augustine Plantation 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Windsor 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Wekiwa Springs 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pheasant Pointe Assisted Living & Memory Care 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE NRG Energy - Seward Generating Station 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE McMurray Operations 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Philly Schuylkill 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wohlsen Construction Self Perform 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakewood Senior Living,Drums ,LLC d/b/a/ Fritzingertown Senior Living Commuity 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR SEMA Logistics LLC 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Options Drums Poconos PA 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Highway Equipment & Supply Co 02 37 FTE
NAT-TCR Hollingsworth USPS Auburn 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Regency Fibers, LLC 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR QCD San Antonio 9.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wenatchee 9.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nelz Logistics LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lighting Innovations, Inc. DBA FC Lighting, Inc. 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE George Jue Manufacturing Co Inc 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Delta Air Lines - MSN 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.