Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Provident Village at Canton

Canton, GA · ~45 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
18.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Provident Village at Canton runs at 493% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Provident Village at Canton: 18.7 TCR = 493% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Provident Village at Canton safety composite

Provident Village at Canton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 18.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Provident Village at Canton: 8.6 → 15.7 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 27.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0.34× in 2020

Provident Village at Canton's TCR rose 7.1 from 8.6 in 2017 to 15.7 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2019 at 27.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Canton, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 18.7 · 493% of ind

  • DART 6.3 DART
  • RANK #193/205
  • PHOTO Carolina Reserve of …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carolina Reserve of Durham (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Provident Village at Canton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Provident Village at Canton averages 18.7 TCR (493% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Provident Village at Canton TCR series: 2017=8.6 · 2018=23.2 · 2019=27.4 · 2020=15.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Provident Village at Canton falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #193 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Provident Village at Canton (45 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Provident Village at Canton
Provident Village at Canton (45 employees, TCR 18.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Provident Village at Canton has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 15.7 6.3 5 0 0
2019 27.4 27.4 9 0 0
2018 23.2 15.5 9 0 0
2017 8.6 2.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Canton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 73 employers in Canton, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carolina Reserve of Durham 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maple Ridge Assisted Living Community LLC 18.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Colonnade at Carrollwood 18.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harbor House 18.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE CWT Farms International 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camilla Golden Peanut Treenut Pecan Shelling 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens TMC - 1004 Boulevard Athens, GA 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lombard 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside Hospital Cherokee 3,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pilgrims Pride Corp 748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processing Plant 747 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Alloy Corporation Canton 402 FTE
NAT-TCR Service Center 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Center Valley Ofc/Whse 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-ABS-0029-0028-00757 18.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Nampa-Happy Valley #144 18.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dedicated - LIDL 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rcp West End Co-Op Building 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Home Care Charlottesville 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE LSNE Harvey Road 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.