Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Virginia

Province Place of Maryview

Portsmouth, VA · ~37 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Province Place of Maryview runs at 188% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Province Place of Maryview: 7.2 TCR = 188% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Province Place of Maryview safety composite

Province Place of Maryview scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.15 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.7

2016→2021

Province Place of Maryview injury rate improved

Province Place of Maryview's TCR fell 7.7 from 11.4 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 14.4 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=8.0 · 2020=14.4 · 2021=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Portsmouth, VA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.2 · 188% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #100/199
  • PHOTO Ohio Living - Greate…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ohio Living - Greater Akron (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Province Place of Maryview in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Province Place of Maryview averages 7.2 TCR (188% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Province Place of Maryview TCR series: 2016=11.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=5.4 · 2019=8 · 2020=14.4 · 2021=3.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Province Place of Maryview falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 199 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Virginia.

Province Place of Maryview (37 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Province Place of Maryview
Province Place of Maryview (37 employees, TCR 7.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Province Place of Maryview has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.7 3.7 1 0 0
2020 14.4 10.8 4 0 0
2019 8.0 8.0 3 0 0
2018 5.4 5.4 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 11.4 9.1 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · VA · Portsmouth

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 137 employers in Portsmouth, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ohio Living - Greater Akron 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Villas of Holly Brook - Harrisburg 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Concord Parkway 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilmington Management Company 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Silver Creek Orchards, Inc. 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Robert S. Coleman Lumber Co., Inc 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pulaski Svc Ctr 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central District 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maryview Medical Center 1,724 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia International Gateway 926 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ceres Hampton Roads 797 FTE
CITY-NEAR Virginia International Gateway by Virginia Interna 545 FTE
NAT-TCR BROWN AVIATION LOGISTICS Newark NJ 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rapid Recycling, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Preferred Medical Products - Centennial 7.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 483221-Ft Worth Tx P&Dc 7.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lakeside Industries (070) 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harsco Mansfield 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Target (WC USX TNC) 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Central Freight Lines, Inc - Austin 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.