Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Kentucky

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre

Lexington, KY · ~73 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre: 10.1 TCR = 267% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre safety composite

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.76 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre: 0.0 → 20.3 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 20.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.67× in 2018

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre's TCR rose 20.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 20.3 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.67× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lexington, KY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 267% of ind

  • DART 6.8 DART
  • RANK #40/56
  • PHOTO IP Avanti Lafayette …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IP Avanti Lafayette OPCO LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Provision Living at Beaumont Centre averages 10.1 TCR (267% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=20.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Provision Living at Beaumont Centre falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 56 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Kentucky.

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre (73 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Provision Living at Beaumont Centre
Provision Living at Beaumont Centre (73 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Provision Living at Beaumont Centre has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 20.3 6.8 9 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · KY · Lexington

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 652 employers in Lexington, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IP Avanti Lafayette OPCO LLC 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crestwood Manor 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Somerset Assisted Living 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Collwood 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE LGE-KU, Electric System Control, Simpsonville 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scott & Ritter, Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Power Truss 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interplastic Corporation Fort Wright 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Kentucky - Main Campus - Fayette County 11,013 FTE
CITY-NEAR UK Healthcare 9,922 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central KY - Gatton Beaumont 3,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR YMCA of Central Ky - High Street 3,895 FTE
NAT-TCR G-FAM, Corp dba Paul Davis Restoration of Boston South & Rhode Island 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR NEW Cooperative, Inc. - Lidderdale Mill 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Santa Cruz Center (Cacru) 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Highway Motors Inc 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Castleton 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fruita Consumers' Cooperative Association 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zenith HD - Conover 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Integrated Physicians Managments Services, Inc. 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.