Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and slicers (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing · Illinois

Provisur Technologies Mokena

Mokena, IL · ~228 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Provisur Technologies Mokena runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and slicers (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Provisur Technologies Mokena: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and slicers (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Provisur Technologies Mokena safety composite

Provisur Technologies Mokena scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.51 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Provisur Technologies Mokena: 1.1 → 1.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 1.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.25× in 2018

Provisur Technologies Mokena's TCR rose 0.4 from 1.1 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.9 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333241 · Mokena, IL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 0.4 DART
  • RANK #5/17
  • PHOTO Sani-Matic, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~228 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sani-Matic, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Provisur Technologies Mokena in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Provisur Technologies Mokena averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and slicers (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Provisur Technologies Mokena TCR series: 2016=1.1 · 2017=1.9 · 2018=1.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Provisur Technologies Mokena falls in its industry

215 Food choppers, grinders, mixer establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 17 Food choppers, grinders, mixer employers in Illinois.

Provisur Technologies Mokena (228 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Provisur Technologies Mokena
Provisur Technologies Mokena (228 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Provisur Technologies Mokena has more employees than the Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and sli median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.5 0.4 4 0 0
2017 1.9 0.0 5 0 0
2016 1.1 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333241 · IL · Mokena

215 Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and slicers (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 47 employers in Mokena, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sani-Matic, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR A.J. Antunes & Co 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heat and Control Galesburg 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Frontmatec 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Clearwater Paper Elwood LLC 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Antioch 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gateway Truck & Refrigeration 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Channahon 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer273 265 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presence Life Connections 250 FTE
CITY-NEAR 273 - Mokena 249 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corporate 228 FTE
NAT-TCR Race Brothers Farm Supply 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5127 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR dd's DISCOUNTS Store 5161 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Rochester Atlantic Avenue 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE General Stamping & Metalworks - South Bend 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Prime Pak Foods 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Easton Hib (Paeto) 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fife Building (Wafif) 228 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.