Communications wire and cable, nonferrous, made from purchased nonferrous wire · Mississippi

Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC

Corinth, MS · ~53 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Communications wire and cable, nonferrous, made from purchased nonferrous wire workplace, earning a grade D.

Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC: 6.2 TCR = 187% of Communications wire and cable, nonferrous, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC safety composite

Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC: 2.4 → 9.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 9.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.69× in 2023

Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC's TCR rose 7.5 from 2.4 in 2022 to 9.9 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335929 · Corinth, MS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 187% of ind

  • DART 4.2 DART
  • RANK P9
  • PHOTO Interplex Engineered…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Interplex Engineered Products (0.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Mississippi employers → · Look up another →

Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC averages 6.2 TCR (187% of the Communications wire and cable, nonferrous, made from purchased nonferrous wire BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC TCR series: 2022=2.4 · 2023=9.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC falls in its industry

144 Communications wire and cable, establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC (53 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC
Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC (53 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 97 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Prysmian Group-Draka Elevator-Corinth MS DC has fewer employees than the Communications wire and cable, nonferrou median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 9.9 4.2 7 0 0
2022 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335929 · MS · Corinth

144 Communications wire and cable, nonferrous, made from purchased nonferrous wire employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,083 rated employers in Mississippi with headcount on file · 49 employers in Corinth, MS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Interplex Engineered Products 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR General Cable Industries, LLC 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Killdeer Mountain Manufacturing, Inc. Hettinger facility 5.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champlain Cable Pan American Corporation 5.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Empire Group, Inc. 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meridian Service Center 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glass, Inc. 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE B Clean, LLC 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mississippi Reman 1,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keytronic (MS) 374 FTE
CITY-NEAR Keytronic 364 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 105 334 FTE
NAT-TCR Pan-O-Gold Baking Company-Sauk Rapids, MN 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Intel FM5 Cafe 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Brentwood Industries 621 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Pleasant View 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE R Dunnica 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE T & T Manufacturing, LLC. 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE SAT San Antonio International Airport 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Badger Wine & Spirits, LLC 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.