Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Pennsylvania

PSI Container

Mcadoo, PA · ~49 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PSI Container runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade B.

PSI Container: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PSI Container safety composite

PSI Container scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2016→2024

PSI Container injury rate improved

PSI Container's TCR fell 2.1 from 2.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 8.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.1 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Mcadoo, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/81
  • PHOTO 4342 Houston Sheet P…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4342 Houston Sheet Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

PSI Container in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PSI Container averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PSI Container TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2018=3.9 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=2.1 · 2021=8.4 · 2022=2.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where PSI Container falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 81 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Pennsylvania.

PSI Container (49 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0123456 Average employees Total Case Rate PSI Container
PSI Container (49 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

PSI Container has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2021 8.4 4.2 4 0 0
2020 2.1 0.0 1 0 0
2019 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 3.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · PA · Mcadoo

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 9 employers in Mcadoo, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4342 Houston Sheet Plant 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4316 Sioux Falls SD Container 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heartland Sheets 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Container Corp 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bonnie Brae Fruit Farms, Inc. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE R & L Orchard Co. 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vallorani Mushrooms 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Story of PA- Smithfield (AWH) 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR Little Leaf Farms PA 248 FTE
CITY-NEAR VHG 225 FTE
CITY-NEAR Altadis USA Inc. 105 FTE
CITY-NEAR ITG Cigars 100 FTE
NAT-TCR National Wrecking Company 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Belle River Service Center 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Granite Falls Energy, LLC 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR USA FL Winter Haven DSC 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Longfellow'S Greenhouses 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Viacon, Inc 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kimble Company Recycle Center Twinsburg 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kase Printing, Inc. 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.