Building Maintenance Services · Texas

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared

Mt. Pleasant, TX · ~175 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared runs at 91% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building Maintenance Services workplace, earning a grade C.

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared: 4.1 TCR = 91% of Building Maintenance Services BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared safety composite

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2018

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared injury rate improved

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared's TCR fell 2.4 from 5.3 in 2017 to 2.9 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.28× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561720 · Mt. Pleasant, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.1 · 91% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #279/417
  • PHOTO PJS of San Antonio
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~175 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: PJS of San Antonio (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared averages 4.1 TCR (91% of the Building Maintenance Services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=2.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared falls in its industry

4,064 Building Maintenance Services establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #279 safest of 417 Building Maintenance Services employers in Texas.

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared (175 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared
Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared (175 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Pssi / Pilgrim'S Corp - Mt. Pleasant Prepared has more employees than the Building Maintenance Services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 2.9 1.2 3 2 0
2017 5.3 4.2 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561720 · TX · Mt. Pleasant

4,064 Building Maintenance Services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 28 employers in Mt. Pleasant, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR PJS of San Antonio 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PSSI / THE HILLSHIRE BRANDS COMPANY - KANSAS CITY 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 212425 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penn Highlands Elk Hospital 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gallant Industrial 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE CAM Industrial Solutions @ Eastman Chemical Company TXO 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE KenMor : KenMor - Houston 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE BT Houston 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR PILGRIMS MT PLEASANT WEST PLANT 1,543 FTE
CITY-NEAR PILGRIMS MT. PLESANT EAST PLANT 559 FTE
CITY-NEAR PILGRIMS MT PLEASANT PREPARED FOODS 479 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mid America Pet Food LLC 139 FTE
NAT-TCR Office 76 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Office 55 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Healthcare Visions, Inc. dba Beechwood 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Jasper Clinic 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE CREIGHTON 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE NuVasive Manufacturing - West Carrollton 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE BASF Attapulgus Site 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pine Forest 175 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.