Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Texas

Pt Arth Sabine Sta

Orange, TX · ~75 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.2
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pt Arth Sabine Sta runs at 14% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade A.

Pt Arth Sabine Sta: 0.2 TCR = 14% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pt Arth Sabine Sta safety composite

Pt Arth Sabine Sta scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 98% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 98% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Pt Arth Sabine Sta injury rate improved

Pt Arth Sabine Sta's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Orange, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.2 · 14% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/86
  • PHOTO 00518 HUNTINGTON PLANT
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 00518 HUNTINGTON PLANT (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Pt Arth Sabine Sta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pt Arth Sabine Sta averages 0.2 TCR (14% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pt Arth Sabine Sta TCR series: 2016=1.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Pt Arth Sabine Sta falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 98% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 86 Electric power generation, fos employers in Texas.

Pt Arth Sabine Sta (75 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pt Arth Sabine Sta
Pt Arth Sabine Sta (75 employees, TCR 0.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Pt Arth Sabine Sta has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · TX · Orange

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 83 employers in Orange, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 00518 HUNTINGTON PLANT 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR COPE GENERATING PLANT 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Winyah Generating Station 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kennett Square - Power HQ 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crownover Farms dba Lone Star Family Farms 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Village farms Marfa 1 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rice, TX 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE CACTUS OPERATING 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Dow Chemical Company - Orange, Texas 859 FTE
CITY-NEAR International Paper Orange Mill 484 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duphil Corporate Office 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Golden Triangle Polymers 328 FTE
NAT-TCR J&S Construction 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockfon 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Garyville Refinery 0.2 TCR
NAT-TCR BrandSafway Industries LLC - P66 Wood River Refinery 0.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE First Companies INC 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kaskaskia Engineering Group, LLC. 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bristol Farms - 015 - BF Westwood 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pyles Plumbing & Utility Contractors, Inc. 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.