Distribution of electric power · Minnesota
Public Utilities
New Ulm, MN · ~56 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 5.4
- Avg TCR
- 1.2
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Public Utilities runs at 449% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.
Public Utilities: 5.4 TCR = 449% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Public Utilities safety composite
Public Utilities scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
34/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- F 5.39 per 100 workers
Safer than 18% of industry peers
- DART rate
- D 1.69 per 100 workers
Safer than 39% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−8.8
2017→2024
Public Utilities injury rate improved
Public Utilities's TCR fell 8.8 from 12.2 in 2017 to 3.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2017=12.2 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=3.4
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 221122 · New Ulm, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade F · TCR 5.4 · 449% of ind
- DART 1.7 DART
- RANK #56/85
- PHOTO NEWBURGH
- BOOK 8y book
- INJ 21 inj
- SIZE ~56 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: NEWBURGH (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →
Public Utilities in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Public Utilities
5.4 TCR
- NEWBURGH
NEWBURGH
5.4 TCR
- Tri-County Ele
Tri-County Electric- Blanchard
5.4 TCR
- FPB -Service C
FPB -Service Center
5.4 TCR
- Intercounty El
Intercounty Electric Cooperative Association
5.4 TCR
What this shows Public Utilities averages 5.4 TCR (449% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).
Public Utilities TCR series: 2017=12.2 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=9.7 · 2020=6.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=7.3 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.4 · BLS 1.2
Where Public Utilities falls in its industry
2,958 Distribution of electric power establishmentsSafer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.
Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 85 Distribution of electric power employers in Minnesota.
Public Utilities has more employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 3.4 | 1.7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 7.3 | 0.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 6.2 | 6.2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 9.7 | 7.3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2.1 | 0.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 12.2 | 12.2 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
221122 · MN · New Ulm
2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 79 employers in New Ulm, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | NEWBURGH | 5.4 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Tri-County Electric- Blanchard | 5.4 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | FPB -Service Center | 5.4 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Intercounty Electric Cooperative Association | 5.4 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | LDC.FAR | 56 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Shakopee Public Utilities | 56 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | CenterPoint Energy - Mankato | 56 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Hammers Construction | 56 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | J&R Schugel Trucking, Inc. | 926 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | New Ulm | 722 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | New Ulm Medical Center | 640 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Martin Luther College | 441 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Dgdg 10 LLC | 5.4 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | NEWBURGH | 5.4 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Bala Cynwyd, PA | 5.4 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Cameron & Associate 8 Hagen Construction, LLc | 5.4 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Henry J. Mills Filtration Plant | 56 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Flexmaster USA, Inc. | 56 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Hilton Garden Inn Carlsbad Beach | 56 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | EnTech Plastics Inc | 56 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.