Oil, petroleum, bulk stations and terminals · North Carolina

Pugh Lubricants Winchester

Asheboro, NC · ~43 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pugh Lubricants Winchester runs at 595% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Oil, petroleum, bulk stations and terminals workplace, earning a grade F.

Pugh Lubricants Winchester: 13.1 TCR = 595% of Oil, petroleum, bulk stations and terminals BLS 2.2 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pugh Lubricants Winchester safety composite

Pugh Lubricants Winchester scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2019→2023

Pugh Lubricants Winchester injury rate improved

Pugh Lubricants Winchester's TCR fell 2.1 from 13.8 in 2019 to 11.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 20.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=13.8 · 2020=20.5 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=11.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 424710 · Asheboro, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 595% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #4/4
  • PHOTO NOCO Energy Tonawand…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NOCO Energy Tonawanda Terminal (0.9 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Pugh Lubricants Winchester in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pugh Lubricants Winchester averages 13.1 TCR (595% of the Oil, petroleum, bulk stations and terminals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pugh Lubricants Winchester TCR series: 2019=13.8 · 2020=20.5 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=11.7 · BLS 2.2

Where Pugh Lubricants Winchester falls in its industry

275 Oil, petroleum, bulk stations establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 4 Oil, petroleum, bulk stations employers in North Carolina.

Pugh Lubricants Winchester (43 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pugh Lubricants Winchester
Pugh Lubricants Winchester (43 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 40 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Pugh Lubricants Winchester has more employees than the Oil, petroleum, bulk stations and termin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.7 9.3 5 0 0
2022 10.3 7.7 4 0 0
2021 9.2 9.2 4 0 0
2020 20.5 10.3 8 0 0
2019 13.8 11.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

424710 · NC · Asheboro

275 Oil, petroleum, bulk stations and terminals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 139 employers in Asheboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NOCO Energy Tonawanda Terminal 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grass Valley 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arizona Petroleum 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR STAR Energy FS 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE LEWIS NURSERY 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Little Man Farming INC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE NC Grow Out 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Bern Complex 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236-Energizer/Asheboro 1,287 FTE
CITY-NEAR 8020236 Energizer Asheboro 654 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark, LLC Plant 5 633 FTE
CITY-NEAR Technimark LLC - Plant 5 466 FTE
NAT-TCR B & D Plumbing, Heating & AC Inc. 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Imperial Aluminum 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Iron & Machine - Foundry 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmetto Landing 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE NPC South Claysburg 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE NorthStar Medical Radioisotopes LLC - Femrite 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE BB Masonry, Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Columbia River Steel & Construction, Inc 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.