Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing · Florida

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart

Stuart, FL · ~267 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart runs at 90% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart: 3.0 TCR = 90% of Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart safety composite

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart: 2.5 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.7 TCR · DART/TCR 1.35× in 2024

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart's TCR rose 2.2 from 2.5 in 2022 to 4.7 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Stuart, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.0 · 90% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #22/24
  • PHOTO Whitcraft Thomasvill…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~267 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Whitcraft Thomasville Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart averages 3.0 TCR (90% of the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart TCR series: 2022=2.5 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart falls in its industry

366 Aircraft engine and engine par establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 24 Aircraft engine and engine par employers in Florida.

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart (267 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart
Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart (267 employees, TCR 3.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Pursuit Aerospace - Stuart has more employees than the Aircraft engine and engine parts (except median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.0 13 1 0
2023 1.8 1.8 5 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · FL · Stuart

366 Aircraft engine and engine parts (except carburetors, pistons, piston rings, valves) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 138 employers in Stuart, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Whitcraft Thomasville Plant 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Supply Chain Batesville MS 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aircraft Precision Products, Inc 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pratt and Whitney Engine Services, Inc. 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE MCS OF TAMPA INC 267 FTE
STATE-SIZE JRL Ventures LLC - Sarasota 267 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pompano 267 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jerry Ulm Dodge 267 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2160 SE Ocean Blvd Bldg. 2 (Thrift Shop) (TCH5) 4,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR Martin Memorial Health Systems Inc 4,568 FTE
CITY-NEAR CC MARTIN HEALTH 1,836 FTE
CITY-NEAR NuCO2, LLC 1,136 FTE
NAT-TCR The Chefs' Warehouse Midwest 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Packless Industries 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Altium Packaging - Poland Plant 3.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 758 3.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6529 267 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Food Stores 6523 267 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wabash Cleburne 267 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pima County Juvenile Court 267 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.