Materials recovery facility construction · New Mexico

QA Engineering

Albuquerque, NM · ~50 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

QA Engineering runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Materials recovery facility construction workplace, earning a grade C.

QA Engineering: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Materials recovery facility construction BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

QA Engineering safety composite

QA Engineering scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

QA Engineering held a steady TCR band

QA Engineering's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.0 TCR.

2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Albuquerque, NM AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P100
  • PHOTO DPR Construction - C…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DPR Construction - Corporate Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Mexico employers → · Look up another →

QA Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows QA Engineering averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Materials recovery facility construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

QA Engineering TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.9

Where QA Engineering falls in its industry

924 Materials recovery facility co establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
QA Engineering (50 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate QA Engineering
QA Engineering (50 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

QA Engineering has fewer employees than the Materials recovery facility construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · NM · Albuquerque

924 Materials recovery facility construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,241 rated employers in New Mexico with headcount on file · 944 employers in Albuquerque, NM · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DPR Construction - Corporate Services 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Austin Co. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8921 Lyondell Channelview PG 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JEG AF DS4 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE DJR Operating, LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE WPX Energy, Inc. - Permian 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carlsbad Branch 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Atlas Electrical Construction, Inc. 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR NM-01 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR Presbyterian Hospital 4,298 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cooper Administrative Center 3,531 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - ABQ1 1,917 FTE
NAT-TCR TXC101551 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR EPIC Tampa 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Putzel Electrical Contractors, Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Pitman Glass Company 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hagerstown/HGI-2 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE D&D Packaging, a Rusken Company 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valli Logistics Inc 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Isd 2909 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.