Control equipment, electric, manufacturing · Washington

QCC Quality Controls Corporation

Lynnwood, WA · ~24 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

QCC Quality Controls Corporation runs at 12% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Control equipment, electric, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

QCC Quality Controls Corporation: 0.4 TCR = 12% of Control equipment, electric, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

QCC Quality Controls Corporation safety composite

QCC Quality Controls Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

QCC Quality Controls Corporation: 0.0 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 8.02× in 2024

QCC Quality Controls Corporation's TCR rose 3.3 from 0.0 in 2017 to 3.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 8.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335314 · Lynnwood, WA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 12% of ind

  • DART 3.3 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO HQ
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~24 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HQ (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

QCC Quality Controls Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows QCC Quality Controls Corporation averages 0.4 TCR (12% of the Control equipment, electric, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

QCC Quality Controls Corporation TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where QCC Quality Controls Corporation falls in its industry

156 Control equipment, electric, m establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Control equipment, electric, m employers in Washington.

QCC Quality Controls Corporation (24 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate QCC Quality Controls Corporation
QCC Quality Controls Corporation (24 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 1.3

QCC Quality Controls Corporation has fewer employees than the Control equipment, electric, manufacturi median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335314 · WA · Lynnwood

156 Control equipment, electric, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 112 employers in Lynnwood, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HQ 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tech Park 2 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR OS Operations LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nexus Controls 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Krainick Dairy LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE View Point Dairy 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacific Shellfish Grays Harbor LLC 24 FTE
STATE-SIZE Olympia Yard 24 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eldec Aerospace Corp. 741 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Lynnwood 542 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1190 - LYNNWOOD WA WHSE 322 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00180 297 FTE
NAT-TCR Bengal Crane and Rigging, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Zeller & Gmelin Corp 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Schroeder Industries LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell - Plant 3 - CDC 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Admin Office I 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE W.L. Roenigk, Inc. - Cabot 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Dodge City 24 FTE
NAT-SIZE La Verne - Brackett - 6PV 24 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.