Cases, wood shipping, nailed or lock corner, manufacturing · Florida

QPS Companies, Inc.

Tampa, FL · ~34 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

QPS Companies, Inc. runs at 150% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cases, wood shipping, nailed or lock corner, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

QPS Companies, Inc.: 4.9 TCR = 150% of Cases, wood shipping, nailed or lock corner, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

QPS Companies, Inc. safety composite

QPS Companies, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2023

QPS Companies, Inc. injury rate improved

QPS Companies, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.2 from 11.0 in 2017 to 8.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 11.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=11.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321920 · Tampa, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 150% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #13/33
  • PHOTO Kamps Pallets South …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kamps Pallets South Charleston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

QPS Companies, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows QPS Companies, Inc. averages 4.9 TCR (150% of the Cases, wood shipping, nailed or lock corner, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

QPS Companies, Inc. TCR series: 2017=11 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.1 · 2022=5.7 · 2023=8.8 · BLS 3.3

Where QPS Companies, Inc. falls in its industry

952 Cases, wood shipping, nailed o establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 33 Cases, wood shipping, nailed o employers in Florida.

QPS Companies, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate QPS Companies, Inc.
QPS Companies, Inc. (34 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 51 employees and a TCR of 6.3

QPS Companies, Inc. has fewer employees than the Cases, wood shipping, nailed or lock cor median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 8.8 2.9 3 0 0
2022 5.7 0.0 2 0 0
2021 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 11.0 4.4 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321920 · FL · Tampa

952 Cases, wood shipping, nailed or lock corner, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kamps Pallets South Charleston 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Upshur Forest Products,LLC 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHEP Hammond Service Center (USQM) 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kamps Bloomfield 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Potato F 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE POK Okeechobee Clean Energy Center 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE PFL Lauderdale Plant 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE MN8 Energy LLC - Delray Beach Office 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC 10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tampa General Hospital 7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valet Living, LLC 6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100) 5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #1788 Chambersburg, PA 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Humtown Additive 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Peregrine Homecare Strategies of NY, LLC 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR ShopRite Of Emerson # 117 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Five Star Residences of Clearwater 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Drake Lighting Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE ACCO Brands - Pleasant Prairie Mfg. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE A. L. Smith Trucking, Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.