Planing mills, millwork · New York

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc.

Orchard Park, NY · ~48 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Planing mills, millwork workplace, earning a grade C.

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc.: 3.8 TCR = 114% of Planing mills, millwork BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. safety composite

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 65% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2024

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. injury rate improved

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc.'s TCR fell 0.4 from 5.1 in 2017 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 6.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.24× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321918 · Orchard Park, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.8 · 114% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #4/8
  • PHOTO Metrie Retail - Stor…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Metrie Retail - Store Service (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. averages 3.8 TCR (114% of the Planing mills, millwork BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. TCR series: 2017=5.1 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=2.4 · 2020=4.6 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=6.7 · 2023=2.3 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. falls in its industry

317 Planing mills, millwork establishments

Safer than 65% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Planing mills, millwork employers in New York.

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc.
Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. (48 employees, TCR 3.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 4.9

Quaker Millwork & Lumber, Inc. has fewer employees than the Planing mills, millwork median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2023 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2022 6.7 6.7 3 0 0
2021 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2020 4.6 2.3 2 0 0
2019 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2017 5.1 5.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321918 · NY · Orchard Park

317 Planing mills, millwork employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 72 employers in Orchard Park, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Metrie Retail - Store Service 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anthony Oak Flooring, Inc. 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ideal Stair Parts 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR ACGI a subsidiary of Armstrong World Industries 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kreher Enterprises LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE SENECA STREET CREW LOCATION-NY04 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE NIAGARA FALLS SERVICE CENTER-NY37 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enbridge St. Lawrence Gas - Massena 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Systems Orchard Park 455 FTE
CITY-NEAR MSD ORCHARD PARK 448 FTE
CITY-NEAR McGard llc 437 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10 Cobham 420 FTE
NAT-TCR BHM1 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Metrie Retail - Store Service 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Los Angeles 3.8 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #280 3.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hampstead Dc 0220 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Providence PCC of Senatobia, LLC 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE View Homes San Antonio 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE P/A Industries Inc. 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.