Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing · New York

Qualitrol - Fairport

Fairport, NY · ~257 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Qualitrol - Fairport runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Qualitrol - Fairport: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Qualitrol - Fairport safety composite

Qualitrol - Fairport scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Qualitrol - Fairport: 0.3 → 1.4 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 1.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.06× in 2023

Qualitrol - Fairport's TCR rose 1.1 from 0.3 in 2016 to 1.4 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.06× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334513 · Fairport, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #3/13
  • PHOTO SICK Bloomington
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~257 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SICK Bloomington (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Qualitrol - Fairport in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Qualitrol - Fairport averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Qualitrol - Fairport TCR series: 2016=0.3 · 2017=0.4 · 2018=0.7 · 2019=0.3 · 2020=0.7 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=1.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Qualitrol - Fairport falls in its industry

322 Controllers for process variab establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 13 Controllers for process variab employers in New York.

Qualitrol - Fairport (257 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Qualitrol - Fairport
Qualitrol - Fairport (257 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 96 employees and a TCR of 1.3

Qualitrol - Fairport has more employees than the Controllers for process variables (e.g., median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 1.4 0.7 4 0 0
2022 0.8 0.4 2 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2020 0.7 0.4 2 0 0
2019 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2017 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334513 · NY · Fairport

322 Controllers for process variables (e.g., electric, electronic, mechanical, pneumatic operation) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 36 employers in Fairport, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SICK Bloomington 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABB - Measurement & Analytics 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR HEIDENHAIN CORPORATION 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerson Automation Solutions - Shakopee 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE FCS Group 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE ALBANY NY (MANNING BLVD) PLANT 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Albany NY Bread (Prospect Rd) Plant 257 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bren-Tronics, Inc. 257 FTE
CITY-NEAR Perinton 609 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wegmans Perinton 024 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR LiDestri Fairport 400 FTE
CITY-NEAR LiDestri Foods INC. 360 FTE
NAT-TCR S&S Precision 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hampton Inn & Suites Chicago (Matteson) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR T&T Enterprises Inc 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hoffman Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Raleigh Rpo 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marietta Terminal 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE Main Campus 257 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flex-O-Lators Carthage 257 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.