Building automation system installation contractors · Florida

Quality Building Controls

Name: Quality Building Controls Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Tampa, FL · ~59 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

C
Average Safety Record: 2.3
Avg TCR: 2.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Building Controls runs at 81% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Building automation system installation contractors workplace, earning a grade C.

Quality Building Controls: 2.3 TCR = 81% of Building automation system installation contractors BLS 2.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Building Controls safety composite

Quality Building Controls scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): D 2.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers
DART rate: D 1.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2021→2022

Quality Building Controls injury rate improved

Quality Building Controls's TCR fell 1.7 from 3.1 in 2021 to 1.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2021 at 3.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=3.1 · 2022=1.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Tampa, FL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.3 · 81% of ind

DART 1.4 DART
RANK #109/275
PHOTO JBEC
BOOK 2y book
INJ 2 inj
SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JBEC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.3
JBEC

2.3
Allison-Smith

2.3
Greiner Electr

2.3
BLK ELECTRIC

2.3

What this shows Quality Building Controls averages 2.3 TCR (81% of the Building automation system installation contractors BLS benchmark).

Quality Building Controls TCR series: 2021=3.1 · 2022=1.4 · BLS 2.8

Where Quality Building Controls falls in its industry

4,550 Building automation system ins establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

Grade C

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #109 safest of 275 Building automation system ins employers in Florida.

Quality Building Controls (59 employees, TCR 2.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Quality Building Controls has fewer employees than the Building automation system installation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries	Illnesses	Fatalities
2022	1.4	1.4	0	1	0
2021	3.1	1.6	2	0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · FL · Tampa

4,550 Building automation system installation contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,659 employers in Tampa, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	JBEC	NORTHBROOK, IL	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Allison-Smith Co. - North Carolina	LENOIR, NC	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Greiner Electric, LLC	LITTLETON, CO	2.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR	BLK ELECTRIC	N MANKATO, MN	2.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE	2406-Felda, FL (Monsanto Co.)	FELDA	59 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Emerald Packing Company LLC	ORLANDO	59 FTE
STATE-SIZE	PTF Plant Turkey Point	FLORIDA CITY	59 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Winter Haven Service Area	TAMPA	59 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Diversified Maintenance Systems LLC	Tampa	10,600 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Tampa General Hospital	Tampa	7,849 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Valet Living, LLC	Tampa	6,337 FTE
CITY-NEAR	ST. Joseph's Hospital (5100)	Tampa	5,540 FTE
NAT-TCR	Albuquerque 39370	Albuquerque, NM	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	The Plains Oh Depot	The Plains, OH	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Sodexo at Arkansas State Univ-Arkasa	State University, AR	2.3 TCR
NAT-TCR	Google Kirkland LocalHost Cafe	Kirkland, WA	2.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE	4765-SGFCX0UPS	Sprinfield, MO	59 FTE
NAT-SIZE	5107 Burnsville Unique	Burnsville, MN	59 FTE
NAT-SIZE	1149 Apple Valley	Apple Valley, MN	59 FTE
NAT-SIZE	1090 Sioux Falls	Sioux Falls, SD	59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.